Fields Don't Fail Overnight.

Risk Builds Quietly.

Data Reveals How to Act.

A data story about crop health, risk, and yield in the Netherlands.

The Baseline Reality

Before we can improve, we need to see clearly where we stand.

30.1%
0.0%

of plants show signs of being unhealthy

64.1%
0.0%

of farmland has at least one sub-optimal factor

The gap is bigger than it looks.

Top performers aren't just slightly better—they're in a different league.

The gap? A staggering +101.9% more yield.

Bottom 25% Yield100 (baseline)
Top 25% Yield201.9(+101.9%)
+101.9%more yield from
top performers

Weather is not neutral.

Extreme conditions carry a measurable penalty.

Dry Conditions

Moderate stress on crops

-2.3%

Very Wet Conditions

Severe impact on yield

-9.9%

Wet extremes hurt more than dry extremes.

Risk concentrates in four signals.

These factors predict trouble before it spreads.

Signal 1

Unhealthy Status

Signal 2

High Stress (level 99)

Signal 3

Low Yield (<2467.30)

Signal 4

Early Growth Stage

Risk Distribution

How risk factors correlate with yield.

No risk factors

No risk factors still isn't the majority.

One risk factor

One risk factor becomes the norm.

Two factors

Two factors: productivity drops sharply.

Three factors

At 3 factors, we enter urgent territory.

Four factors

4 factors is rare, but extremely costly.

Average Productivity
3,337.62kg/ha

Fields by Risk Count (%)

0 factors26.2%
1 factor0.0%
2 factors0.0%
3 factors0.0%
4 factors0.0%

Productivity by Risk Level

3338
0
1
2
3
4
Risk factors count
Urgent Action Required

Over 0% of fields require immediate intervention.

These are fields with 3 or more risk factors—where action today prevents loss tomorrow.

4%
3+ risk factors

Loss is measurable. So is recovery.

See what's at stake—and what's possible.

Total Potential Loss
€70,849,226
10% of maximum potential
🌱
Average Loss Per Plant
€334.16
Recoverable with targeted intervention

Potential Recovery Path

Current Loss
-€70.8M
After Intervention
+€11.1M

Efficiency beats volume.

This isn't only about more water—it's about smarter use.

The difference: +32.2% yield with smarter water use.

Water Efficiency Comparison

Bottom 25% Yield2435 kg/ha
Top 25% Yield3219 kg/ha
+32.2%
yield advantage

Water-Limited Land

25%

Only 25% of land is water-limited—efficiency improvements have wide reach.

One factor dominates.

Understanding what drives productivity helps focus your efforts.

1
Risk Count0.0%

Correlation: 0.390 — Risk count alone explains over half of productivity variation.

2
GPS Coordinates0.0%
3
Weed Coverage0.0%
4
Temperature0.0%
5
Temporal Images0.0%
6
Multispectral Images0.0%
7
Wind Speed0.0%
8
Thermal Images0.0%
9
Pest Damage0.0%
10
Bounding Boxes0.0%

Turn risk into yield.

One field at a time.